Saksynt - Gunnar Tjomlid
Tag: Debbie Nathan

Debbie Nathan som spåkone

En fin artikkel fra journalisten Debbie Nathan hvor hun forteller om sin fortid som «teletorg spåkone».

Afterward I learned that the biggest company, Psychic Friends, was taking in $150 million a year before it was bankrupted last year by competition from numerous smaller companies including Psychic Readers, Kenny Kingston and LaToya Jackson. By the late 1990s, these businesses had jacked the industry’s earnings up to at least $300 million annually. For this we can thank the Reagan administration; in 1984, the Federal Communications Commission lifted its 16-minute-an-hour restriction on TV advertising, paving the way for monster hourlong infomercials. Add to this a dramatic proliferation of 800- and 900-number marketing and computerized billing technologies. The result was an enormous “futures” market.

At the time, I was a struggling freelance journalist, so I decided to write about the industry after working in it. As someone who’s so skeptical of the paranormal that half the time I can’t remember my astrological sign, I thought it would be revealing if someone like myself could do a good job as a dial-a-clairvoyant.


Men ting ble mer personlig og komplisert enn hun hadde forestilt seg…

Debbie Nathan tenker høyt om barneporno

Debbie Nathan skrev i fjor sommer i sin blogg om at hun mente journalister burde ha rettslig immunitet til å oppsøke og undersøke barneporno som en del av sitt arbeide. Hun har i mine øyne svært mange gode poeng, bl.a:

I’m worried that the government has declared an entire field of law enforcement and public policy off-limits from empirical critique by academia and the fourth estate. I want a process that allows non-governmental investigators and journos to be vetted and qualified as child-porn researchers. I’m not sure who would do the vetting or what the criteria would be. Neither is Penn State’s Jenkins. Still, says Jenkins, if front-line research and reporting remains prohibited, “if there’s no garbage filter, no independent means for checking, verifying or criticizing the government, that’s very worrisome. As an analogy, just imagine if every word we knew about terrorism came from the FBI or the White House.”

Jeg tør ikke tenke på det en gang. Når vi vet hvordan Bush og co har fortiet og manipulert fakta om global oppvarming, evolusjon osv, så ser vi hvor viktig det er med en aktiv presse som kan rette et kritisk søkelys på den informasjonen folket serveres av myndighetene. Vi ser eksempler på det samme når det gjelder barneporno og pedofile overgripere også fra norske og europeiske myndigheter.

  • Informasjon

  • Sitatet

    I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours. — Stephen Roberts

  • Nyeste bloggposter

  • about.me

    Always be skeptical, but dare to be naive.

    Born in Tanzania, 1974. Grew up in Norway (Sirdal) and Kenya. Lives in Oslo.

    Skeptic, secular humanist and nerd @heart.

    Blogger, writer, musician and father @private.

    CEO and web developer @Thin.

  • DiSQUS

  • Stikkordsky

  • Tordenbloggen 2010

    unfiltered perception ble kåret til Norges beste blogg i 2010.

    Se hva leserne sier om bloggen min her.

  • Oppgi din e-postadresse og få varsling hver gang jeg legger ut en ny bloggpost!

  • Velg kategori

  • Arkiv: Vis måned/år

  • Sånne telledingser

  • Meta